Indigenous peoples to say no to a compromise forced on, and let the SUPREME court
At a hearing this Wednesday (28th) in the world today, the representatives of the indigenous movement, give you a period to reconcile with the Supreme, and continue in the fight for the defense of the Constitution of the Federal
“We do not do business with the very seriously”, said indigenous leaders, as they leave the Camera on for the Reconciliation of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) (STF), which discusses the Law in the Framework of time (number of 14.701/2023), said on Wednesday (28).
The reading of the position of the motion has been carried out under the leadership of the indigenous Mariazinha Baré, co-chair of the Joint Organizations, and Indigenous Peoples of the Amazonas (Apiam), and a representative of the Coordination of the Indigenous Organizations of the Brazilian Amazon (Coiab), in camera).
In a letter read out by Mariazinha, the Articulation of the Indigenous Peoples of Brazil (APIB) has also underscored the lack of a space in which to negotiate the rights that had been held by the decision of full-time (nine-to-two vote of the u.s. Supreme Court, which ruled on the unconstitutionality of the decision of the landmark in time, and in September of the previous year.
The output of the indigenous organizations of the Chamber of Conciliation takes place after the first encounter, in which the leaders have been the target of discrimination, and the Supreme does not comply with the terms and conditions of participation of indigenous peoples in discussions, and ignoring the claims of the indigenous movement within the stock, which discusses the law on the SUPREME court.
As the legal coordinator of APIB, Mauritius, the Availability of the leaders, they were open to dialogue, but none of the events of the indigenous peoples of the inside of the case was addressed by the minister of the rapporteur Mendes.
“There is a demand for the APIB for it to be led by the minister of the rapporteur, Edson Fachin. But the prime minister Gilmar did not respond to the request. It is important that the brazilian company is aware of what we’re trying all the time to peticionamos to the Supreme Court, the prime minister is mainly to provide the conditions to ensure equal participation,” said Maurice Availability.
In addition to the decision of whether or not to withdraw from the desk of the settlement, the indigenous movement in Brazil, by means of the APIB, also called the Chamber of Conciliation is to be shut down.
“We saw a lot of goals, many of the charges, did not have dialogue about it. For this reason, we are pulling out, and we’re going to the your territory to do this in front of a struggle. I understand that we’re still going to suffer persecution, the major threat, but we’re not going to give up our land. In the framework of time, we don’t exist,” said Edinho the Baptist, the leader of the general Council of the Indian state of Roraima (CIR), during a press conference.
For indigenous peoples, and to start a constructive dialogue, it is critical for the immediate suspension of the law, 14.701, and that it’s unconstitutional, and it is already causing uncertainty and the rise of violence in our communities.
To determine the date of 1988, the threshold for the demarcation of the territories, the law violates the Constitution, Federal government, which recognizes the right of originating from the indigenous peoples to their lands, and there is a date to mark in time.